avatar
Pratiksha B. Gaikwad
  • HOME
  • EDUCATION
  • INTERNSHIPS
  • HONORS AND AWARDS
  • SKILLS
  • QUANTUM COMPUTING
  • TALKS
  • BLOGS
  • CATEGORIES
Home Notes on Antisymmetrized Product of Rank-Two Geminals
Post
Cancel

Notes on Antisymmetrized Product of Rank-Two Geminals

Posted Feb 28, 2026 Updated Feb 28, 2026
By Pratiksha B. Gaikwad
3 min read
Notes on Antisymmetrized Product of Rank-Two Geminals
Notes on Antisymmetrized Product of Rank-Two Geminals

Antisymmetrized Product of Rank-Two Geminals (APr2G)

Mathematical Notes and Intuition

This note summarizes the key mathematical ideas behind the antisymmetrized product of rank-two geminals (APr2G) introduced by Johnson et al. in the paper A size-consistent approach to strongly correlated systems using a generalized antisymmetrized product of nonorthogonal geminals.

Goals:

  • Understand why permanents appear in APIG.
  • See why they are computationally hard.
  • Understand how Borchardt’s theorem converts permanents into determinants.
  • See how this leads to the APr2G ansatz.
  • Clarify connections to AGP, APSG, Richardson states, and projected HFB.

1. APIG Wavefunction

The antisymmetrized product of interacting geminals (APIG) is

\[| \Psi \rangle = \prod_{p=1}^{P} \left( \sum_{i=1}^{K} c_{i,p} \ a_i^\dagger a_{\bar{i}}^\dagger \right) |0\rangle\]

where

  • $P$ = number of electron pairs
  • $K$ = number of spatial orbital pairs
  • $c_{i,p}$ = geminal coefficients
  • $a_i^\dagger a_{\bar{i}}^\dagger$ creates a singlet pair in orbital $i$

Because electrons are fermions,

\[(a_i^\dagger a_{\bar{i}}^\dagger)^2 = 0\]

so each orbital pair can be occupied at most once. Therefore,

\[P \le K\]

2. Expansion into Slater Determinants

Choose a Slater determinant where orbital pairs

\[\{ i_1, i_2, \dots, i_P \}\]

are occupied.

Each geminal must choose one of these orbitals.

There are $P!$ possible assignments:

  • geminal 1 chooses $i_{\sigma(1)}$
  • geminal 2 chooses $i_{\sigma(2)}$
  • …
  • geminal $P$ chooses $i_{\sigma(P)}$

where $\sigma$ is a permutation.

The determinant coefficient becomes

\[\sum_{\sigma} \prod_{p=1}^{P} c_{i_{\sigma(p)},p}\]

This is exactly the permanent of a matrix.


3. Why the Matrix is P x P

For a fixed determinant:

  • Rows correspond to geminals $p = 1, \dots, P$
  • Columns correspond to the $P$ occupied orbital pairs

The coefficient matrix has dimension

\[P \times P\]

The Slater determinant coefficient is

\[\mathrm{perm}(C)\]

4. Why Permanent (Not Determinant)

Pair creation operators commute:

\[\hat g_i^\dagger \hat g_j^\dagger = \hat g_j^\dagger \hat g_i^\dagger\]

Swapping two geminals does not introduce a minus sign.

Therefore we get a permanent, not a determinant.


5. Computational Difficulty

Permanent evaluation scales as

\[\mathcal{O}(P!)\]

This is #P-hard.

General APIG is therefore computationally intractable.


6. The Key Idea: Cauchy Structure

Johnson et al. impose the special form

\[c_{i,p} = \frac{1}{e_i - k_p}\]

This is a Cauchy matrix.

For a Cauchy matrix $C$, Borchardt’s theorem states

\[\mathrm{perm}(C) = \frac{\det(C \circ C)}{\det(C)}\]

where

  • $C \circ C$ is the elementwise square
  • determinants are polynomial-time computable

Thus,

Permanent -> ratio of determinants

This reduces exponential scaling to polynomial scaling.


7. Pfaffians and Hafnians

The discussion connects to broader pairing algebra.

Determinant:

  • Appears with antisymmetry (fermions)
  • Used in Slater determinants

Permanent:

  • Appears with commuting objects
  • Appears in APIG

Pfaffian:

  • Defined for antisymmetric matrices
  • Satisfies
\[\mathrm{Pf}(A)^2 = \det(A)\]
  • Appears in BCS and Pfaffian QMC wavefunctions

Hafnian:

  • Bosonic analogue of Pfaffian
  • Counts pairings without antisymmetry
  • Appears in bosonic Gaussian states

Conceptually:

Determinant -> fermions
Permanent -> boson-like pairing
Pfaffian -> fermionic pairing
Hafnian -> bosonic pairing

APr2G sits inside this broader pairing structure.


8. Final APr2G Wavefunction

With the Cauchy parametrization:

\[|\Psi_{\mathrm{APr2G}}\rangle = \prod_{p=1}^{P} \left( \sum_{i=1}^{K} \frac{1}{e_i - k_p} a_i^\dagger a_{\bar{i}}^\dagger \right) |0\rangle\]

The Slater determinant coefficients become

\[\phi_{\{i\}} = \frac{\det(C \circ C)}{\det(C)}\]

This makes the ansatz polynomially tractable.


9. Hierarchy and Connections

APr1G = AGP

If

\[c_{i,p} = f_i\]

(all geminals identical), we obtain the antisymmetrized geminal power (AGP).


AGP -> Slater determinant

If only $P$ orbitals have nonzero $f_i$, AGP reduces to a single Slater determinant.


APr2G -> APSG

If parameters separate into orbital blocks, geminals become strongly orthogonal and we recover APSG.


APr2G -> Richardson wavefunction

If $k_p$ satisfy Richardson equations, APr2G reproduces exact pairing Hamiltonian eigenstates.


AGP <-> Projected HFB

AGP is equivalent to number-projected Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov theory.

Hierarchy:

Slater $\subset$ AGP $\subset$ APr2G


10. Beauty of This Work

  • Makes nonorthogonal geminals computationally feasible.
  • Uses Borchardt’s theorem to bypass permanent scaling.
  • Unifies AGP, APSG, Richardson, and projected HFB.
  • Provides size-consistent polynomial scaling.
  • Connects quantum chemistry and integrable pairing models.

blogs, geminals
This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.
Share

© 2026 Pratiksha B. Gaikwad. Some rights reserved.

Powered by Jekyll with Chirpy theme.

A new version of content is available.